These four interactive models translate the dissertation’s core claim into spatial form: Soviet-era talking points on famine commemoration transform predictably across register boundaries (secret memo → embassy/Novosti → domestic news → diaspora/scholarly print), and that transformation is dated and measurable - Montreal 1983 as anchor, post-1983 phrase-network rewire as qualitative explosion. Hover any element for a quick label; click for verbose context including what each connection proves, what it cannot prove alone, and how it fits boundary non-equivalence.
Each embed opens with several paragraphs on thesis significance - especially what connections mean. Connections are not decorative lines: they are pair-read adjudications with proof tiers stored in open JSON. Use Hide panel (top-right) to toggle the detail popout. Drag to rotate; scroll to zoom; click any dot, bar, arc, or line for the full argument in the side panel.
Thirteen ingested surfaces, five traced relay arcs (2 proven thematic, 1 verbatim outward packet, 2 Farisei-tier memo-claim links). Shell 2 (autocommunication) is empty until inward CC/KGB companions arrive - sparse by design. Click sky-blue thematic arcs from spr. 1206 to see how internal hostility transforms into outward denial without copying scare quotes. Pravda’s lack of outward arcs is itself the domestic-silence finding. CIUS 1986 and full dialogue arcs appear in L1-demo until CIUS is ingested into register-relay JSON.
Target-state model with fabricated companions: autocommunication shell, silence voids, CIUS dialogue arc, exile broadcast. Same click-panel logic as L1 - use this to see what the full checklist produces when populated.
Spatial heatmap of operator skew - internal scare-quote towers vs flat embassy columns on the same row. Connections here are implicit comparisons between columns, not drawn arcs.
Pre/post 1983 phrase co-occurrence inside the fond. Red upper-plane edges = new co-occurrences after Montreal - qualitative rewire, not louder counts.